<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CE Week #2:  &#8220;Top Israeli candidates declare victory&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pkautzman.edublogs.org/2009/02/11/ce-week-2-top-israeli-candidates-declare-victory/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pkautzman.edublogs.org/2009/02/11/ce-week-2-top-israeli-candidates-declare-victory/</link>
	<description>Mt. Spokane High School AP Government &#38; Politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 21:42:40 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Cyle Christianson</title>
		<link>http://pkautzman.edublogs.org/2009/02/11/ce-week-2-top-israeli-candidates-declare-victory/comment-page-1/#comment-5644</link>
		<dc:creator>Cyle Christianson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Feb 2009 21:45:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pkautzman.edublogs.org/?p=860#comment-5644</guid>
		<description>In response to Makayla Sander:

I think that the article did hint as to who will be the next Prime Minister of Israel. They said that the President is able to pick the Prime Minister that will leave the country in the best situation. And, it seems from the article that it would be the hawkish Netanyahu, since there is an extreme amount of violence in the nation, and that Palestine is set to take Israel off of the map. Personally, I would like to have the more diplomatic Tzipi Livni become prime minister, but I am not President of Israel.

I think that this election is one of the most detrimental events that has happened so far this year, as the United States may be forced to stand behind a nation in the middle of a holy war that seems like it will never cease, unless one side is no more. The difference in ideology amongst the top parties is reminiscent of the American political system, a hawkish blood-thirsty party, and a more passive diplomatic party. 

Hopefully, regardless of whom the Prime Minister of Israel is, there will be a nice and tidy resolution of this problem in the Middle-East, and the United States will not have to get overly involved.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In response to Makayla Sander:</p>
<p>I think that the article did hint as to who will be the next Prime Minister of Israel. They said that the President is able to pick the Prime Minister that will leave the country in the best situation. And, it seems from the article that it would be the hawkish Netanyahu, since there is an extreme amount of violence in the nation, and that Palestine is set to take Israel off of the map. Personally, I would like to have the more diplomatic Tzipi Livni become prime minister, but I am not President of Israel.</p>
<p>I think that this election is one of the most detrimental events that has happened so far this year, as the United States may be forced to stand behind a nation in the middle of a holy war that seems like it will never cease, unless one side is no more. The difference in ideology amongst the top parties is reminiscent of the American political system, a hawkish blood-thirsty party, and a more passive diplomatic party. </p>
<p>Hopefully, regardless of whom the Prime Minister of Israel is, there will be a nice and tidy resolution of this problem in the Middle-East, and the United States will not have to get overly involved.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jordan Yaeger</title>
		<link>http://pkautzman.edublogs.org/2009/02/11/ce-week-2-top-israeli-candidates-declare-victory/comment-page-1/#comment-5628</link>
		<dc:creator>Jordan Yaeger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Feb 2009 01:33:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pkautzman.edublogs.org/?p=860#comment-5628</guid>
		<description>In Response to Rachel Damiano:

The current president Shimon Peres will probably side with Tzipi Livni and the Kadima Party he will pick her because the Kadima party received the most votes.  But in order for them to have the Prime minister position they need to form a coalition which needs to rally political parties together in order to get 50% plus 1 seat. They need 61 seats.  Most likely scenario is that Kadima will combine with the Labor party only getting roughly 45 seats if they gain a very small party with a few seats.  Then since they won&#039;t form a government (61 seats), then Shimon Peres has to pick the party with second most votes which is Benyamin Netenyahu&#039;s Likud party which will combine with the other conservative parties including the Yisrael Beytanu (Israel is our Home) and the ultra-orthodox Shas party therefore creating a government. 

Just because Israel is a Jewish state does not mean everyone is religious and follows everything. In reality, most Israeli&#039;s are secular. We live in a new age and Israeli&#039;s don&#039;t see a problem with women in power. The only citizens that are really against it are those who are ultra-orthodox. 

The country in most areas Jews, Arabs, and Christians live next door in peace. That is quite the generalization that if a Palestinian state it would be a terrorist state. I mean the reason they want it is because they don&#039;t agree with Israel or any of its policies or their relatives didn&#039;t take the offer to become Israeli citizens back in 1948.  I mean as much as I would like to see Israel keeping everything including Gaza and the West Bank but if Hamas/Hezbollah (they are the same thing both supported by Iran)or Fatah (new version of Arafat&#039;s Palestinian Liberation Organization) is taken out and is kept out, a Palestinian state wouldn&#039;t be all that bad.  They just have to be able to build their own government and take care of themselves. Maybe after all of that is said and done peace might reach the middle east.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In Response to Rachel Damiano:</p>
<p>The current president Shimon Peres will probably side with Tzipi Livni and the Kadima Party he will pick her because the Kadima party received the most votes.  But in order for them to have the Prime minister position they need to form a coalition which needs to rally political parties together in order to get 50% plus 1 seat. They need 61 seats.  Most likely scenario is that Kadima will combine with the Labor party only getting roughly 45 seats if they gain a very small party with a few seats.  Then since they won&#8217;t form a government (61 seats), then Shimon Peres has to pick the party with second most votes which is Benyamin Netenyahu&#8217;s Likud party which will combine with the other conservative parties including the Yisrael Beytanu (Israel is our Home) and the ultra-orthodox Shas party therefore creating a government. </p>
<p>Just because Israel is a Jewish state does not mean everyone is religious and follows everything. In reality, most Israeli&#8217;s are secular. We live in a new age and Israeli&#8217;s don&#8217;t see a problem with women in power. The only citizens that are really against it are those who are ultra-orthodox. </p>
<p>The country in most areas Jews, Arabs, and Christians live next door in peace. That is quite the generalization that if a Palestinian state it would be a terrorist state. I mean the reason they want it is because they don&#8217;t agree with Israel or any of its policies or their relatives didn&#8217;t take the offer to become Israeli citizens back in 1948.  I mean as much as I would like to see Israel keeping everything including Gaza and the West Bank but if Hamas/Hezbollah (they are the same thing both supported by Iran)or Fatah (new version of Arafat&#8217;s Palestinian Liberation Organization) is taken out and is kept out, a Palestinian state wouldn&#8217;t be all that bad.  They just have to be able to build their own government and take care of themselves. Maybe after all of that is said and done peace might reach the middle east.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Dyer</title>
		<link>http://pkautzman.edublogs.org/2009/02/11/ce-week-2-top-israeli-candidates-declare-victory/comment-page-1/#comment-5625</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Dyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2009 23:48:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pkautzman.edublogs.org/?p=860#comment-5625</guid>
		<description>In response to Rachel Damiano:

Rachel, the Palestinians are not all terrorists. Only Hamas and groups like them are. Palestine would not become a terrorist nation. Most Palestinians would, upon the creation of a Palestinian state, not seek to actively destroy Israel. The U.S. would not support creating Palestine if it was believed that it would turn against us or Israel. The Palestinian President himself has stated that there would be peace if Palestine was created. If they got their own country, it would go a long way to achieve peace in the region. Think about it: one of the main justifications of the terrorist groups like Hamas to attack Israel is that Palestinians don’t have a country and that Hamas (or other groups) attacks Israel to get a country. We know that story is a load of crap, but the people there will believe because they are desperate. Create Palestine and the people will no longer need to turn to the terrorists in order to feel safe; they will have a true government and country to do that, and it will leave the terrorists floundering for a while. This would be even more effective if, as part of the creation of a Palestinian state, that Israel and Palestine would become allies and would work together, which will likely be a factor in such a plan to create Palestine. And Rachel, most Jews do not have such literal interpretations of the Old Testament as you do, so that if Tzipi Livni does win, her being a woman won’t be an issue. Israel has already had a female prime minister.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In response to Rachel Damiano:</p>
<p>Rachel, the Palestinians are not all terrorists. Only Hamas and groups like them are. Palestine would not become a terrorist nation. Most Palestinians would, upon the creation of a Palestinian state, not seek to actively destroy Israel. The U.S. would not support creating Palestine if it was believed that it would turn against us or Israel. The Palestinian President himself has stated that there would be peace if Palestine was created. If they got their own country, it would go a long way to achieve peace in the region. Think about it: one of the main justifications of the terrorist groups like Hamas to attack Israel is that Palestinians don’t have a country and that Hamas (or other groups) attacks Israel to get a country. We know that story is a load of crap, but the people there will believe because they are desperate. Create Palestine and the people will no longer need to turn to the terrorists in order to feel safe; they will have a true government and country to do that, and it will leave the terrorists floundering for a while. This would be even more effective if, as part of the creation of a Palestinian state, that Israel and Palestine would become allies and would work together, which will likely be a factor in such a plan to create Palestine. And Rachel, most Jews do not have such literal interpretations of the Old Testament as you do, so that if Tzipi Livni does win, her being a woman won’t be an issue. Israel has already had a female prime minister.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Dyer</title>
		<link>http://pkautzman.edublogs.org/2009/02/11/ce-week-2-top-israeli-candidates-declare-victory/comment-page-1/#comment-5622</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Dyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2009 07:23:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pkautzman.edublogs.org/?p=860#comment-5622</guid>
		<description>Not good. The last thing the Middle East needs is the country with the best military and most enemies to have political instability in who will be the leader. This really doesn’t bode all that well. Iran already wants Israel dead; Hamas and Hezbollah are still rather hostile. With two parties claiming victory, this could get real ugly at a really bad time. If this escalates, it could be used against Israel by its enemies as proof of its instability. I think it might be a good thing that Israel’s offensive in Gaza already happened and that a truce is being negotiated between Israel and Hamas. I must shake my head at the fact that each party has said they won a clear victory, when the Kadima Party had only one more seat than the Likud Party. Hopefully, President Shimon Peres will be able to deal with this before it creates chaos. In a nutshell, the Likud Party wants to be more hard-lined in terms of the threats to Israel like Hamas and Hezbollah and opposes the creation of a Palestinian state. The Kadima Party is more focused on diplomacy and favors the U.S. backed negotiation of creating Palestine. These positions are kind of a big deal in Israel, and one that most are divided on. I personally want a combination of a hard-line stance on threats from Hamas and Hezbollah, but I also think allowing Palestine to become a nation will bring a great measure of peace to the region I believe that this needs to be settled quickly, in order make sure that the relative peace is not shaken.

Connection: Elections and parliamentary systems of government v. Congressional systems of government. This makes me really glad for the election system in the United States, because we do not and likely will never have this kind of drama in choosing the leader of our nation. The closest thing we had was the 2000 election fiasco. Compared to the drama that the parliamentary system can have during elections and the instability that coalitions can bring, I think I’ll stick to supporting our system.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not good. The last thing the Middle East needs is the country with the best military and most enemies to have political instability in who will be the leader. This really doesn’t bode all that well. Iran already wants Israel dead; Hamas and Hezbollah are still rather hostile. With two parties claiming victory, this could get real ugly at a really bad time. If this escalates, it could be used against Israel by its enemies as proof of its instability. I think it might be a good thing that Israel’s offensive in Gaza already happened and that a truce is being negotiated between Israel and Hamas. I must shake my head at the fact that each party has said they won a clear victory, when the Kadima Party had only one more seat than the Likud Party. Hopefully, President Shimon Peres will be able to deal with this before it creates chaos. In a nutshell, the Likud Party wants to be more hard-lined in terms of the threats to Israel like Hamas and Hezbollah and opposes the creation of a Palestinian state. The Kadima Party is more focused on diplomacy and favors the U.S. backed negotiation of creating Palestine. These positions are kind of a big deal in Israel, and one that most are divided on. I personally want a combination of a hard-line stance on threats from Hamas and Hezbollah, but I also think allowing Palestine to become a nation will bring a great measure of peace to the region I believe that this needs to be settled quickly, in order make sure that the relative peace is not shaken.</p>
<p>Connection: Elections and parliamentary systems of government v. Congressional systems of government. This makes me really glad for the election system in the United States, because we do not and likely will never have this kind of drama in choosing the leader of our nation. The closest thing we had was the 2000 election fiasco. Compared to the drama that the parliamentary system can have during elections and the instability that coalitions can bring, I think I’ll stick to supporting our system.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rachel Damiano :)</title>
		<link>http://pkautzman.edublogs.org/2009/02/11/ce-week-2-top-israeli-candidates-declare-victory/comment-page-1/#comment-5621</link>
		<dc:creator>Rachel Damiano :)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2009 06:39:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pkautzman.edublogs.org/?p=860#comment-5621</guid>
		<description>Well I suppose two parties won the election.  Yep, clear as mud at night.  The fact that both the lead candidates were so close shows how split Israel is.  It is also quite interesting how prominent a female candidate is.  Israel is Jewish.  In being such, they follow the teachings of the Old Testament God who taught that women should not be in a spiritual position over men.  The Prime Minister of Israel will be just such a leader.  If a Palestinian state were to be formed it would very bad.  The Palestine leaders are out to destroy Israel; that makes them terrorists.  Wouldn’t it be lovely to have an established terrorist nation in the world of which the creation of said nation was supported by the United States of America, the leader of the FREE world?  I find it interesting that the President of Israel gets to decide which government to establish.  It gives this person tremendous authority over the entire fate of the nation.  

Connection:  Israel is a multi-party system.  It is interesting to see that both the Kadima party and the Likud party claimed a large victory and yet neither got anywhere near even one quarter of the seats in parliament.  It just goes to show how different America is from other Democratic nations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well I suppose two parties won the election.  Yep, clear as mud at night.  The fact that both the lead candidates were so close shows how split Israel is.  It is also quite interesting how prominent a female candidate is.  Israel is Jewish.  In being such, they follow the teachings of the Old Testament God who taught that women should not be in a spiritual position over men.  The Prime Minister of Israel will be just such a leader.  If a Palestinian state were to be formed it would very bad.  The Palestine leaders are out to destroy Israel; that makes them terrorists.  Wouldn’t it be lovely to have an established terrorist nation in the world of which the creation of said nation was supported by the United States of America, the leader of the FREE world?  I find it interesting that the President of Israel gets to decide which government to establish.  It gives this person tremendous authority over the entire fate of the nation.  </p>
<p>Connection:  Israel is a multi-party system.  It is interesting to see that both the Kadima party and the Likud party claimed a large victory and yet neither got anywhere near even one quarter of the seats in parliament.  It just goes to show how different America is from other Democratic nations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alexa Erickson</title>
		<link>http://pkautzman.edublogs.org/2009/02/11/ce-week-2-top-israeli-candidates-declare-victory/comment-page-1/#comment-5608</link>
		<dc:creator>Alexa Erickson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2009 03:31:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pkautzman.edublogs.org/?p=860#comment-5608</guid>
		<description>This election is important not only for Israel, but for the United States. As an ally of Israel, the United States is very interested, or should be very interested, in the outcome of this election. Considering all the violence that has been occurring in the area of late, this election is especially important. Whoever will be chosen will drastically change the course of action in this conflict. One candidate supports negotiations, while the other is less inclined toward these peace talks. It is unfortunate, I think, that there is not a more moderate candidate, one who has the qualities of both. Because these candidates are on opposite sides of the spectrum (at least in terms of negotiations with Palestine), a good many people will be disapproving if one is chosen. A more moderate candidate would appease more people. 

I find it interesting that even though a candidate may have won a majority of the seats, the president can still choose the other candidate. This is so unlike the United States. If this were to happen, I wonder if there would be a great public outcry, or if a decision like this is common. 

Connection:  Party Systems
While the U.S. has a system where two candidates representing two major parties are vying for power, the same cannot be said for Israel. Like most other governments, parties form coalitions in order to gain power. Because of this, there are often more than two parties competing for power.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This election is important not only for Israel, but for the United States. As an ally of Israel, the United States is very interested, or should be very interested, in the outcome of this election. Considering all the violence that has been occurring in the area of late, this election is especially important. Whoever will be chosen will drastically change the course of action in this conflict. One candidate supports negotiations, while the other is less inclined toward these peace talks. It is unfortunate, I think, that there is not a more moderate candidate, one who has the qualities of both. Because these candidates are on opposite sides of the spectrum (at least in terms of negotiations with Palestine), a good many people will be disapproving if one is chosen. A more moderate candidate would appease more people. </p>
<p>I find it interesting that even though a candidate may have won a majority of the seats, the president can still choose the other candidate. This is so unlike the United States. If this were to happen, I wonder if there would be a great public outcry, or if a decision like this is common. </p>
<p>Connection:  Party Systems<br />
While the U.S. has a system where two candidates representing two major parties are vying for power, the same cannot be said for Israel. Like most other governments, parties form coalitions in order to gain power. Because of this, there are often more than two parties competing for power.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Makayla Sander</title>
		<link>http://pkautzman.edublogs.org/2009/02/11/ce-week-2-top-israeli-candidates-declare-victory/comment-page-1/#comment-5595</link>
		<dc:creator>Makayla Sander</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 19:42:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pkautzman.edublogs.org/?p=860#comment-5595</guid>
		<description>I think that it is very interesting that Israel has so many competing political parties. It would be interesting to do some research on the difference between governments with many different parties and governments like ours that only have two parties vying for power. It was also strange that the two parties in Israel that are fighting for the top position ended up having almost the same amount of seats, especially since it seems like they have radically different views and policies. One of the groups wants to have peace talks with Palestine, while the other one wants nothing to do with peace talks. One thing that the article did not really explain well was who is going to be in power and managing the government while they take weeks to decide who is going to be the Prime Minister. It mentioned that there is a president who will be able to choose the Prime Minister, but if he is busy doing that then who is going to be running the country? I think that it would be cool if the woman&#039;s party won and she became the Prime Minister since it isn&#039;t very often that there are women in a position with that much power, especially in a country that is so volatile and has so much drama with the other middle eastern nations surrounding it. 

Connection: Israel is in the middle of choosing a new leader, and it is close to Iraq. I wonder how a new leader of the country will affect the war in Iraq, if at all. Is Israel involved in our war in Iraq?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that it is very interesting that Israel has so many competing political parties. It would be interesting to do some research on the difference between governments with many different parties and governments like ours that only have two parties vying for power. It was also strange that the two parties in Israel that are fighting for the top position ended up having almost the same amount of seats, especially since it seems like they have radically different views and policies. One of the groups wants to have peace talks with Palestine, while the other one wants nothing to do with peace talks. One thing that the article did not really explain well was who is going to be in power and managing the government while they take weeks to decide who is going to be the Prime Minister. It mentioned that there is a president who will be able to choose the Prime Minister, but if he is busy doing that then who is going to be running the country? I think that it would be cool if the woman&#8217;s party won and she became the Prime Minister since it isn&#8217;t very often that there are women in a position with that much power, especially in a country that is so volatile and has so much drama with the other middle eastern nations surrounding it. </p>
<p>Connection: Israel is in the middle of choosing a new leader, and it is close to Iraq. I wonder how a new leader of the country will affect the war in Iraq, if at all. Is Israel involved in our war in Iraq?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kyle Hermens</title>
		<link>http://pkautzman.edublogs.org/2009/02/11/ce-week-2-top-israeli-candidates-declare-victory/comment-page-1/#comment-5594</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyle Hermens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 06:16:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pkautzman.edublogs.org/?p=860#comment-5594</guid>
		<description>As the state of Israel is an ally of the U.S. we have a vested interest in their leadership and who is at the head of it. However, surprisingly as dear as Israel is to us diplomatically, we never hear anything about them in television unless they&#039;re attacking certain groups, most recently a group whose name rhymes with &quot;Damas&quot;. So this article actually detailing the parties and other portions of the Israeli organization is actually quite enlightening. The president is the one who chooses what group is at the forefront of creating a new government. The fact that Israel has had a female prime minister before we&#039;ve had a women president is interesting enough to note. However, they&#039;re not so different. They have competing and otherwise opposed interests forming their policy too. They have their military hawks and their peacebrokers, all trying to look out for their country in what they believe to be the best way. It really makes one appreciate that the fact that most national leaders are not so different from our own, when it comes to diverse interests and concern for one&#039;s own nation.

Connection: Proportional Representation- Proportional representation functions differently in Israel. Instead of a population basis, their parliament proportionally divides the seats available depending on voting rates.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As the state of Israel is an ally of the U.S. we have a vested interest in their leadership and who is at the head of it. However, surprisingly as dear as Israel is to us diplomatically, we never hear anything about them in television unless they&#8217;re attacking certain groups, most recently a group whose name rhymes with &#8220;Damas&#8221;. So this article actually detailing the parties and other portions of the Israeli organization is actually quite enlightening. The president is the one who chooses what group is at the forefront of creating a new government. The fact that Israel has had a female prime minister before we&#8217;ve had a women president is interesting enough to note. However, they&#8217;re not so different. They have competing and otherwise opposed interests forming their policy too. They have their military hawks and their peacebrokers, all trying to look out for their country in what they believe to be the best way. It really makes one appreciate that the fact that most national leaders are not so different from our own, when it comes to diverse interests and concern for one&#8217;s own nation.</p>
<p>Connection: Proportional Representation- Proportional representation functions differently in Israel. Instead of a population basis, their parliament proportionally divides the seats available depending on voting rates.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jordan Yaeger</title>
		<link>http://pkautzman.edublogs.org/2009/02/11/ce-week-2-top-israeli-candidates-declare-victory/comment-page-1/#comment-5579</link>
		<dc:creator>Jordan Yaeger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 19:37:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pkautzman.edublogs.org/?p=860#comment-5579</guid>
		<description>This election decides the fate of Israel.  This election in Israel is like the American election this year. You have Tzipi Livni of the Kadima party who is like the Barack Obama of Israel. She is young and a woman which is still close to unheard of in Israel. Then you have Benyamin Netanyahu (his brother Yoni is famous for the raid on Entebbe) is who is part of the right wing Likud party who is the John McCain of Israel. He has been in politics for a long time. This close election is based on how safe the Israeli people are feeling with Hamas in Gaza and Hezbollah in Lebanon.  It was projected the Benyamin Netanyahu will win based on that Hamas is still bombing Sderot as well as the rest of southern Israel and Achmendemijad is still threatening to blow Israel off the face of the earth. Also Tzipi Livni was a part of the current government under Ehud Barack which had a lot of corruption since Ehud Barack had become acting Prime Minister when Ariel Sharon had gone into a coma.  If Netanyahu were to become the new Prime Minister he would not stop until all threats coming from Hamas and Hezbollah are stopped meaning Achmendinajad would have to be removed from power.

Connection: Parliamentry style of government: This requires the majority party to create a coalition to allow the government to run; making compromises to all this to happen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This election decides the fate of Israel.  This election in Israel is like the American election this year. You have Tzipi Livni of the Kadima party who is like the Barack Obama of Israel. She is young and a woman which is still close to unheard of in Israel. Then you have Benyamin Netanyahu (his brother Yoni is famous for the raid on Entebbe) is who is part of the right wing Likud party who is the John McCain of Israel. He has been in politics for a long time. This close election is based on how safe the Israeli people are feeling with Hamas in Gaza and Hezbollah in Lebanon.  It was projected the Benyamin Netanyahu will win based on that Hamas is still bombing Sderot as well as the rest of southern Israel and Achmendemijad is still threatening to blow Israel off the face of the earth. Also Tzipi Livni was a part of the current government under Ehud Barack which had a lot of corruption since Ehud Barack had become acting Prime Minister when Ariel Sharon had gone into a coma.  If Netanyahu were to become the new Prime Minister he would not stop until all threats coming from Hamas and Hezbollah are stopped meaning Achmendinajad would have to be removed from power.</p>
<p>Connection: Parliamentry style of government: This requires the majority party to create a coalition to allow the government to run; making compromises to all this to happen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
