CE Week #7: “Al Gore wins Nobel Peace Prize”
Ex-VP, intergovernmental body jointly honored for global warming work
MSNBC staff and news service reports
Updated: 5:57 a.m. PT Oct 12, 2007
function UpdateTimeStamp(pdt) { var n = document.getElementById(”udtD”); if(pdt != ” && n && window.DateTime) { var dt = new DateTime(); pdt = dt.T2D(pdt); if(dt.GetTZ(pdt)) {n.innerHTML = dt.D2S(pdt,((’false’.toLowerCase()==’false’)?false:true));} } } UpdateTimeStamp(’633277906442570000′);
OSLO, Norway – Former Vice President Al Gore and the U.N.’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change won the 2007 Nobel Peace Prize Friday for their efforts to spread awareness of man-made climate change and lay the foundations for counteracting it.
“I am deeply honored to receive the Nobel Peace Prize,” Gore said in a statement. “We face a true planetary emergency. The climate crisis is not a political issue, it is a moral and spiritual challenge to all of humanity.”
Gore won an Academy Award this year for his film “An Inconvenient Truth,” a documentary on global warming, and had been widely expected to win the prize.
“His strong commitment, reflected in political activity, lectures, films and books, has strengthened the struggle against climate change,” the citation said. “He is probably the single individual who has done most to create greater worldwide understanding of the measures that need to be adopted.”
It cited Gore’s awareness at an early stage “of the climatic challenges the world is facing.”
Panel’s two decades
The committee also cited the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change for two decades of scientific reports that have “created an ever-broader informed consensus about the connection between human activities and global warming.”
The IPCC groups 2,500 researchers from more than 130 nations and issued reports this year blaming human activities for climate changes ranging from more heat waves to floods. It was set up in 1988 by the United Nations to help guide governments.
Climate change has moved high on the international agenda this year. The U.N. climate panel has been releasing reports, talks on a replacement for the 1997 Kyoto Protocol on climate are set to resume and on Europe’s northern fringe, where the awards committee works, there is growing concern about the melting Arctic.
The Norwegian Nobel Committee said global warming “may induce large-scale migration and lead to greater competition for the Earth’s resources. Such changes will place particularly heavy burdens on the world’s most vulnerable countries. There may be increased danger of violent conflicts and wars, within and between states.”
Gore said he would donate his share of the $1.5 million that accompanies the prize to the non-profit Alliance for Climate Protection.
Ole Danbolt Mjoes, chairman of the prize committee, said the award should not be seen as singling out the Bush administration for criticism.
“A peace prize is never a criticism of anything. A peace prize is a positive message and support to all those champions of peace in the world.”
President Bush abandoned the Kyoto Protocol because he said it would harm the U.S. economy and because it did not require immediate cuts by countries like China and India. The treaty aimed to put the biggest burden on the richest nations that contributed the most carbon emissions.
The U.S. Senate voted against mandatory carbon reductions before the Kyoto negotiations were completed. The treaty was never presented to the Senate for ratification by the Clinton administration.
“Al Gore has fought the environment battle even as vice president,” Mjoes said. “Many did not listen … but he carried on.”
Fans and foes
Reaction to the award was immediate.
“He’s like the proverbial nut that grew into a giant oak by standing his ground,” Patrick Michaels, a scholar with the free market Cato Institute, said in a statement. “We can only hope that he can parlay his prize into a run for the U. S. presidency, where he will be unable to hide from debate on his extreme and one-sided view of global warming.”
British bookmakers once put 100-to-1 odds on Gore winning an Oscar, becoming a Nobel laureate and becoming president. He has now accomplished two of the three, and on Friday bookies slashed the odds to 8/1 from 10/1.
Gore, 59, has been coy, saying repeatedly he’s not running for the Democratic presidential nomination in 2008, without ever closing that door completely.
FoxNews.com columnist Steve Milloy alleged that Gore “plays fast and loose with the facts to advance his personal agenda.”
British Prime Minister Gordon Brown called Gore ” inspirational in focusing attention across the globe on this key issue.”
Julia Marton-Lefèvre, head of the World Conservation Union, said that, “as Mr. Gore and the IPCC have clearly demonstrated, we can solve the grave dangers posed by climate change if we have the will. Let the Nobel Peace Prize become the embodiment of that will.”
“Al Gore made it okay to talk about global warming over breakfast and dinner tables all across America,” added Frances Beinecke, president of the Natural Resources Defense Council. “He made this unprecedented challenge understandable and the solutions accessible for millions of people.”
‘Question of war and peace’
The Nobel committee often uses the coveted prize to cast the global spotlight on a relatively little-known person or cause. Since Gore already had a high profile some had doubted that the committee would bestow the prize on him.
In recent years, the committee has broadened the interpretation of peacemaking and disarmament efforts outlined by Swedish industrialist Alfred Nobel in creating the prize with his 1895 will. The prize now often also recognizes human rights, democracy, elimination of poverty, sharing resources and the environment.
Two of the past three prizes have been untraditional, with the 2004 award to Kenya environmentalist Wangari Maathai and last year’s award to Bangladeshi economist Muhammad Yunus and his Grameen Bank, which makes to micro-loans to the country’s poor.
Jan Egeland, a Norwegian peace mediator and former U.N. undersecretary for humanitarian affairs, called climate change more than an environmental issue.
“It is a question of war and peace,” said Egeland, now director of the Norwegian Institute of International Affairs in Oslo. “We’re already seeing the first climate wars, in the Sahel belt of Africa.” He said nomads and herders are in conflict with farmers because the changing climate has brought drought and a shortage of fertile lands.
The Associated Press and Reuters contributed to this report.
var url=location.href;var i=url.indexOf(’/did/’) + 1;if(i==0){i=url.indexOf(’/print/1/’) + 1;}if(i==0){i=url.indexOf(’&print=1′);}if(i>0){url = url.substring(0,i);document.write(’URL: ‘+url+’
‘);if(window.print){window.print()}else{alert(’To print his page press Ctrl-P on your keyboard \nor choose print from your browser or device after clicking OK’);}}URL: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21262661/
The URI to TrackBack this entry is: http://pkautzman.edublogs.org/2007/10/12/ce-week-7-al-gore-wins-nobel-peace-prize/trackback/
I swear I’ve seen one of his documentaries on Global Warming. However when I read this I was curious as to what exactly the “Kyoto protocol” was, so I looked it up on the internet. “Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change”… Yeah, Kyoto Protocol 1997 is a lot easier to remember, eh? The objection of this protocol is to stabilize greenhouse gasses. Bush says we can’t really follow it because it’ll wreck our economy. I’m sure, so sure, that even if that were true (not saying it isn’t), it wouldn’t completely kill our economy. I mean, we can’t be talking about “Great Depression 2!” because we tried to save the FUTURE. We should be doing something but instead we simply present Gore with his prize instead of actually doing something? But no, nobody cares about the environment until it starts to offend them. It starts getting warmer and people just go, ‘oh well!’
As for Al Gore, I don’t think he should run for president again because… well. He’s 59. By the time he’s out of office he’ll be 65 or so. He probably couldn’t make it anyway, regardless. I’d rather watch him continue to support his cause. He’s good at that.
I figured that eventualy Al Gore would win some kind of awark for his work in creating global warming awarness. However, I didnt think it was going to be a nobel prize award. I do think its great that he won the award because he has been doing alot of workin in global warming. He has created probably the most awarness of global warming than anyother single individual. I suppose that why I think that this is so great is because I like many others am not a fan of global warming and I think that the reason the world is warming is because of us. We need to fix our the problem as best we can and not just sit and wait for it to “fix itself” because it won’t. On the other side of things I didn’t completely agree with how bush tried to handle the problem. He didn’t sign the Kyoto Protocol which we should have done. I can understand the impact that it would have on our economy but we can’t just sit around and do nothing. Bush has not done enough to protect environment because he is too worried about what will happend to our economy among other things. The only negative thing about Gores contribution to helping global warming is that I kinda think he is not only doing it for its own good but I think it will benifit him too. In the future I could see Gore running for president and winning because of his global warming work. I would just like to see him continure to work with combating global warming and not try to focus on being the president.
Reply To Kelsea:
Yeah, I also had to watch Al Gore’s “Inconvenient Truth”. So boring! I’m not sure I’m the biggest Al Gore fan out there. That’s probably because I thought the film was a total flop. It constantly showed flashbacks to his childhood. Call me crazy but that doesn’t exactly convince me that a major climate change is on its way. It’s not that I’m anti-environment whatsoever, I’m just tired of everything being a huge dramatic event. Why can things just be fine somedays? No, it’s the war in Iraq, it’s Congress’ approval rating, it’s social security, it’s North Korea, it’s immigration, it’s the media desensitizing kids, taxes, the price of gasoline… But wait, that’s not all, let’s throw on global warming! I’m just frustrated with American’s ragging on America all the time. I don’t understand why we can’t be content with the efforts our government is extending. The truth is for some people, it will never be enough. Now, I wish the environment the best, I truly do and I hope we someday get on it; but until then, can we all just enjoy life a little bit and lay off the government.
PS Kudos to Al Gore on winning the prize. He’s been very dedicated which is indeed admirable.